Talk:Metroid Prime - Revision history

Kharay1977: /* "About this article" */

2010-07-14T19:25:13Z

‎"About this article"

Najzere: note on main page

2010-07-14T19:03:50Z

note on main page

Kharay1977: /* "About this article" */

2010-07-14T18:31:59Z

‎"About this article"

Manocheese at 18:22, 14 July 2010

2010-07-14T18:22:56Z

Kharay1977: /* "About this article" */

2010-07-14T01:14:47Z

‎"About this article"

Manocheese at 23:54, 13 July 2010

2010-07-13T23:54:49Z

Manocheese at 23:54, 13 July 2010

2010-07-13T23:54:35Z

Kharay1977: Created page with 'See Talk:Metroid Prime/Techniques --~~~~'

2010-07-12T23:06:55Z

Created page with 'See Talk:Metroid Prime/Techniques --~~~~'

New page

See [[Talk:Metroid Prime/Techniques]] --[[User:Kharay1977|Kharay1977]] 23:06, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:25, 14 July 2010
Line 11:		Line 11:
	: ... ironic. Ah well. --[[User:Kharay1977\|Kharay1977]] 18:31, 14 July 2010 (UTC)		: ... ironic. Ah well. --[[User:Kharay1977\|Kharay1977]] 18:31, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
	My advice to add an intro was to put some content for the template to float to the right of. Putting it under a heading beneath the template defeats the purpose, so I took out the redundant heading (it is obvious you're talking about this game and its pages) to show you what I mean. It gets rid of the whitespace, but feel free to revert. You can check Wikipedia to see how almost every page has some kind of floating element to the right, usually an infobox. It's pretty standard. — [[User:Najzere\|najzere]] <small>( [[User talk:Najzere\|talk]] )</small> 19:03, 14 July 2010 (UTC)		My advice to add an intro was to put some content for the template to float to the right of. Putting it under a heading beneath the template defeats the purpose, so I took out the redundant heading (it is obvious you're talking about this game and its pages) to show you what I mean. It gets rid of the whitespace, but feel free to revert. You can check Wikipedia to see how almost every page has some kind of floating element to the right, usually an infobox. It's pretty standard. — [[User:Najzere\|najzere]] <small>( [[User talk:Najzere\|talk]] )</small> 19:03, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
		+	::Not everyone automatically assumes that <nowiki>{{contents}}</nowiki> simply forces itself above any and all <nowiki>==<header>==</nowiki>. Now I do know however. So, thanks for pointing that out to me. --[[User:Kharay1977\|Kharay1977]] 19:25, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:03, 14 July 2010
Line 10:		Line 10:
	* The page can just point people to the other pages with brief descriptions of what each one is for. The ambiguity of the acronyms on the technique page has nothing to do with it. [[User:Manocheese\|Manocheese]] 18:22, 14 July 2010 (UTC)		* The page can just point people to the other pages with brief descriptions of what each one is for. The ambiguity of the acronyms on the technique page has nothing to do with it. [[User:Manocheese\|Manocheese]] 18:22, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
	: ... ironic. Ah well. --[[User:Kharay1977\|Kharay1977]] 18:31, 14 July 2010 (UTC)		: ... ironic. Ah well. --[[User:Kharay1977\|Kharay1977]] 18:31, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
		+	My advice to add an intro was to put some content for the template to float to the right of. Putting it under a heading beneath the template defeats the purpose, so I took out the redundant heading (it is obvious you're talking about this game and its pages) to show you what I mean. It gets rid of the whitespace, but feel free to revert. You can check Wikipedia to see how almost every page has some kind of floating element to the right, usually an infobox. It's pretty standard. — [[User:Najzere\|najzere]] <small>( [[User talk:Najzere\|talk]] )</small> 19:03, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:31, 14 July 2010
Line 9:		Line 9:

	* The page can just point people to the other pages with brief descriptions of what each one is for. The ambiguity of the acronyms on the technique page has nothing to do with it. [[User:Manocheese\|Manocheese]] 18:22, 14 July 2010 (UTC)		* The page can just point people to the other pages with brief descriptions of what each one is for. The ambiguity of the acronyms on the technique page has nothing to do with it. [[User:Manocheese\|Manocheese]] 18:22, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
		+	: ... ironic. Ah well. --[[User:Kharay1977\|Kharay1977]] 18:31, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:22, 14 July 2010
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:2 - There was some talk about the acronyms used on the Techniques page and as some acronyms are arbitrary in the sense as they have no actual meaning any more, it may appear confusing to random visitors.		:2 - There was some talk about the acronyms used on the Techniques page and as some acronyms are arbitrary in the sense as they have no actual meaning any more, it may appear confusing to random visitors.
	:However, it is indeed somewhat debatable whether it is necessary. --[[User:Kharay1977\|Kharay1977]] 01:14, 14 July 2010 (UTC)		:However, it is indeed somewhat debatable whether it is necessary. --[[User:Kharay1977\|Kharay1977]] 01:14, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
		+
		+	* The page can just point people to the other pages with brief descriptions of what each one is for. The ambiguity of the acronyms on the technique page has nothing to do with it. [[User:Manocheese\|Manocheese]] 18:22, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:14, 14 July 2010
Line 4:		Line 4:

	I don't think this section is necessary. It's a given that the Strategy Wiki is about speed running, not basic game play. I'll remove this section if there are no objections. [[User:Manocheese\|Manocheese]] 23:54, 13 July 2010 (UTC)		I don't think this section is necessary. It's a given that the Strategy Wiki is about speed running, not basic game play. I'll remove this section if there are no objections. [[User:Manocheese\|Manocheese]] 23:54, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
		+	:1 - As the contents block is hard coded right aligned, some other content was needed on this page, if for no other reason then for aesthetics.
		+	:2 - There was some talk about the acronyms used on the Techniques page and as some acronyms are arbitrary in the sense as they have no actual meaning any more, it may appear confusing to random visitors.
		+	:However, it is indeed somewhat debatable whether it is necessary. --[[User:Kharay1977\|Kharay1977]] 01:14, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:54, 13 July 2010
Line 3:		Line 3:
	="About this article"=		="About this article"=

−	I don't think this section is necessary. It's a given that the Strategy Wiki is about speed running, not basic game play. I'll remove this section if there are no objections.	+	I don't think this section is necessary. It's a given that the Strategy Wiki is about speed running, not basic game play. I'll remove this section if there are no objections. [[User:Manocheese\|Manocheese]] 23:54, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:54, 13 July 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	See [[Talk:Metroid Prime/Techniques]] --[[User:Kharay1977\|Kharay1977]] 23:06, 12 July 2010 (UTC)		See [[Talk:Metroid Prime/Techniques]] --[[User:Kharay1977\|Kharay1977]] 23:06, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
		+
		+	="About this article"=
		+
		+	I don't think this section is necessary. It's a given that the Strategy Wiki is about speed running, not basic game play. I'll remove this section if there are no objections.